TEXT:
Dear Sir,
Because of life-long and now worsening mental health
problems, I renewed a claim for benefits recently. Following an assessment
interview by ATOS for DWP, I have just had my claim turned down. It was cited,
inter alia, that I could maintain eye
contact. Otherwise, much of the report bore little relation - in letter or in
spirit - to evidence I had offered.
The interview and the letter informing me of its outcome
were so odd that I made enquiries.
It turned out that the person who interviewed me, whom
they called 'Doctor', by whose assessment of my mental state my life will be
profoundly affected, is in fact a physiotherapist.
And whatever Thierry Breton, ATOS boss, may claim about
consultation with patients' own doctors during assessments ("How can ATOS boss
get £1million?"), nobody has been in touch with my GP. An ATOS agent told me
that assessment is made 'on the basis of the day'.
I am warned that I am very foolish to put my head above
the parapet by writing to you. I'll tell you: I'm struggling with the horror and
despair caused by my illness, resisting the relentless impulse to hurt myself (I
won't do anything, but that doesn't ameliorate the impulse); nothing that anyone
can do to damage me means much next to that. In any case, I'm thinking that I
may be too drained of resources to try to appeal - even though I know that IDS,
or somebody, will offer that failure to do so as proof that the assessment was
correct (as they have done again and again with defeated
claimants).
What I report to you here is a very small part of the
weirdness and, frankly, occasional nastiness which started the day I was
informed that I was to be assessed. I am lucky enough to be a bit more
articulate (if not resilient) than some people in my position, so I will say to
you for them: you had better be sure that you want to reject us, or at least
know us to be the parasitical scroungers that are portrayed, because what's
being done to us is contemptible.
Yours etc.
END.
Whether they'll publish, I don't know - it's certainly not really in the house style!
My reasons for writing are complex, but seemed to me compelling. More over the next few days...
Added 12 hours later.
On reflection: The last two paragraphs were... intemperate... and probably ensured that the letter would not be published. Stuff it.
Added 12 hours later.
On reflection: The last two paragraphs were... intemperate... and probably ensured that the letter would not be published. Stuff it.
No comments:
Post a Comment